|
Bob Luttman, Robert Luttman & Associates |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Average/Range Control Charts
Range:R-bar = average of ranges = Sum(Ri) / N
Average/Range - Why TWO Control Charts?
Parsing Variance
When a series of samples is analyzed and charted, variation comes from two sources:
For Example:
Statistical control requires that both sources are in control. AND, since the variance of the mean is dependent on the variance within the sample, within sample variance (either the Range or the Standard Deviation) must be in control first.
Average/Range - Example
You are monitoring volume (cases/day) in the General Surgery Operating Rooms (ni = 5 Rooms). You have collected data for one month:
The Range chart is in control so you may now plot the Xbar chart:
The Xbar chart is not in control. Two points, near the end of the month, indicate a significant rise is volume.
Average / Range - Interpretation
Constants for Xbar and R Charts
|
|
S-bar = average of standard deviations = |
|
UCLS = B4S-bar
LCLS = B3S-bar
Average:
Grand Average = Sum(X-bari) / N
UCLX-bar = Grand Average + A3S-bar
LCLX-bar = Grand Average - A3S-bar
NOTE: The Average Control Chart is meaningless unless the Standard Deviation Control Chart is in control!
Sample Size (ni) A3 B3 B4 2 2.659 0 3.267 3 1.954 0 2.568 4 1.628 0 2.266 5 1.427 0 2.089 6 1.287 0.030 1.970 7 1.182 0.118 1.882 8 1.099 0.185 1.815 9 1.032 0.239 1.761 10 0.975 0.284 1.716 11 0.927 0.321 1.679 12 0.886 0.354 1.646 13 0.850 0.382 1.618 14 0.817 0.406 1.594 15 0.789 0.428 1.572 16 0.763 0.448 1.552 17 0.739 0.466 1.534 18 0.718 0.482 1.518 19 0.698 0.497 1.503 20 0.680 0.510 1.490 21 0.663 0.523 1.477 22 0.647 0.534 1.466 23 0.633 0.545 1.455 24 0.619 0.555 1.455 25 0.606 0.565 1.435
For ni > 25

You are trying to reduce turnaround time in the Operating Rooms. You collect data for one month. First, you plot an S chart to check the process variability:

The S chart is not in control. Assume, though , that despite diligent effort, you cannot find the reason for the special cause variation. You leave the point in the data and plot the Xbar chart.

The Xbar chart is in control. Therefore, any effort to reduce turnaround time must focus on common cause variation.
1. Average bad / Standard Deviation good - The process is stable and precise but performing poorly. Probably only a small number of causes are negatively impacting the process.
2. Average bad / Standard Deviation bad - The worst case scenario. A wildly fluctuating process (in fact, perhaps a "non-process") with a high degree of process variation. The process is changing frequently. First examine and reduce process variation - define and standardize one method.
3. Average good / Standard Deviation bad - An unusual event. Could indicate an outlier in the data, inconsistent but adequate performance, or increasing process variation. Likely to occur when a large number of "processors" (either people or machines) are involved and standardization is not emphasized.
4. Average good / Standard Deviation good - Quality nirvana. A stable, predictable, and high performance process. Do NOT forget continuous improvement, though.
Home Page | Introduction | Statistical Thinking | Control Charts | Individuals Control Charts | Percentage Control Charts | Control Charts for the Average | Choosing the Proper Control Chart | Control Charts - Summary | Histograms | Pareto Analysis | Scatter Diagrams | Conclusion | Assignment | Comments | Questions
rluttman@robertluttman.com
Improving Healthcare Across the Continuum